University student receives No Criminal Penalty for GBH
Bind over at court - no criminal penaltyLead Lawyer
Team Members
Case study summary
Our client was a student with no previous involvement with the police. He was accused of using a knife to injure another student and in his interview, we put forward a statement claiming self-defence. On the first day of trial the prosecution offered a bind-over.
Case study
Our client was a PhD physics student accused of Section 20 GBH without intent. He came from an incredibly supportive family who had never had any involvement with the police in their lives. The initial call from the police came as a massive shock to them.
The prosecution's case was that he deliberately used a knife as a weapon to injure a fellow student after a night out at their shared accommodation. He called our firm as soon as the police contacted him and in his interview, we put forward a strategic prepared statement giving his version of accounts and how he behaved in self-defence.
From the very beginning, our main goal and everything we did was to try and avoid a charge. However, given the fact that a knife was used and injuries were caused, the case proceeded to Birmingham Crown Court.
Our client encountered several personal difficulties throughout the course of the police investigation and court case, including family deaths and not being able to see his wider family abroad due to Covid-19. We supported him through all of his mental health struggles and he was able to stay fighting.
After a tenacious fight with the prosecution over disclosure, we discovered material which called the credibility of the complainant and his friends seriously into question. Nevertheless, we proceeded to trial and on the first day at Court, the prosecution were convinced by us, along with our client's Queen's Counsel, to offer a bind-over. This is a civil disposal rather than a criminal penalty of any kind.
As a result of accepting the bind-over, our client was able to continue his studies with no further disruption and without a criminal case hanging over his family.
Written by:
More cases we’ve defended
Our clients were two local businessmen who were accused of attacking a taxi driver after an argument over the fare. They were found not guilty after trial. The case was thrown out by the judge after Mary Monson cross-examined the prosecution witness.
Our client was security trainer, working as a door supervisor when he was attacked by a drunk man. CCTV presented a misleading picture of what happened. We spent many hours together with him so could perform well in court. The jury found him Not Guilty.
Client accused of assault after an argument in a restaurant. Pleaded guilty to injuring his girlfriend and biting another customer. He was at risk of prison so he retained us. We gave the judge detailed mitigation evidence and hired a top barrister. Outcome - suspended sentence.
Send us a confidential message
We'll get back to you as soon as possible. We are happy to speak to you if you have a query, and either have a free consultation on the phone or in person if necessary.