We're hiring!
Join our team

Criminal Damage - Conditional Discharge Received

Conditional discharge - no criminal penalty
31 May, 2022
Criminal Damage

Lead Lawyer

Team Members

Case study summary

Our client was 63-years-old and retired. In the days following his friend's death, he deliberately damaged a stranger's car. The CPS stated that prison was a real possibility but we argued that this would not be appropriate. He received a conditional discharge.

Case study

Our client faced a charge of criminal damage which amounted to £3,000. He accepted that, in a moment of madness, he deliberately scratched the side of another individual's car with his key. The individual was parked in the disabled bay at his local Asda store. It was clear to us from the beginning that the damage could not have amounted to anywhere near £3,000.

The prosecution argued that the offence passed the custody threshold, meaning that our client face the possibility of being sent to prison. The client was 63-years-old, retired and, at the time of the offence, was struggling to come to terms with the death of his best friend who had suffered with an autoimmune disease. A custodial sentence would have had an extremely negative impact on his already poor mental state. We explained this to the magistrates and argued that this type of sentence would not be appropriate.

The prosecution also requested that our client pay £3,000 in compensation to the complainant. We disputed this and asked them to provide evidence of the damage to the vehicle. When they did, it was clear that the damage amounted to much less than what the prosecution had tried to make our client pay.

The client received a conditional discharge and was ordered to pay significantly less in compensation to the complainant than the prosecution had first suggested. Our client was able to move on with his life and put this case behind him.

Written by:

More cases we’ve defended

Young Man accused of Criminal Damage - Case Dropped

Our client was arrested for allegedly causing minor criminal damage to his home address. After our expert lawyers negotiated with the police, they reluctantly accepted that the client was a child in need of support and he should not be charged.

Investigation discontinued with no further action
Cambridge Analytica/Facebook Case - No Charges

We represented the COO of data company Cambridge Analytica. He was investigated for the alleged misuse of personal data obtained from Facebook in order to influence the 2016 US Presidential Elections. After pressure from our lawyers for over a year, the investigation was dropped.

Investigation discontinued with no further action
Contempt of Court - 'Hijab MP3 Juror' Not Guilty

Our client was a Muslim girl accused of listening to music under her headscarf while on a murder jury. She told us she had her earphones in because they didn't come out easily without her removing the scarf. We convinced the prosecution they couldn't prove music had been playing.

Case discontinued by the prosecution

Send us a confidential message

We'll get back to you as soon as possible. We are happy to speak to you if you have a query, and either have a free consultation on the phone or in person if necessary.

Contact us

Contact information

Send us a confidential message and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

0161 794 0088

Send us a message