Caution for workman charged with possession of a weaponClient received a caution- case did not proceed to court
Case study summary
Our client was a 21-year-old site manager charged with possession of a lock knife. After our expert lawyers highlighted he had been charged with the wrong offence, the case returned to the police. The court prosecution was dropped, he received a caution, and avoided a conviction.
Our client had been charged with possession of an offensive weapon during a search in custody for a separate matter. Having been arrested for drink driving, our client was found to have a lock knife attached to his belt.
These were two serious allegations which would impact his livelihood as a building site manager. He used the knife every day at work but, on this occasion, had been driving back from the pub and had no defence for having it with him. Knowing what was at stake, he contacted our expert lawyers to help him understand and prepare his defence.
We began a review of the case immediately. Whilst our client knew he was pleading guilty to drink driving, there were many uncertainties regarding his weapon charge. With three weeks to prepare for court, we worked swiftly to obtain glowing character references which allowed the court to see him as the young, hard-working man that he is.
Through our careful analysis of the evidence, our expert lawyers identified that he had been charged incorrectly based on the knife he had. We immediately brought this to the attention of the judge and prosecution at our client's first court hearing. Our in-depth explanation of the law prompted the case to be returned to the police for reconsideration. After a short review, and thanks to our lawyers' careful submissions, the police decided this should be dealt with by a caution and not at court.
We were able to pass on the good news and our client received the formal caution a few days later. He and his family were grateful that we had changed the outcome of this case so quickly. Our client is now able to continue his work knowing that, despite his disqualification from driving, he did not have a conviction which could have affected his career.
More cases we’ve defended
Our client had complex mental health needs. He had a taken knife with him to a public venue not knowing it was illegal. We persuaded the court that this was an expectational case and they agreed to depart from the normal sentencing guidelines and give a conditional discharge.
Our client, a 17-year-old autistic child, received a conditional discharge after we persuaded the court to refer his case to the Youth Offenders Team. He was provided with the support he needed, as opposed to punishment from the Criminal Courts.
We represented the COO of data company Cambridge Analytica. He was investigated for the alleged misuse of personal data obtained from Facebook in order to influence the 2016 US Presidential Elections. After pressure from our lawyers for over a year, the investigation was dropped.
Send us a confidential message
We'll get back to you as soon as possible. We are happy to speak to you if you have a query, and either have a free consultation on the phone or in person if necessary.